公司LOGO
传统监考模式与在线监考模式口语考试的对比研究
摘要: 本文探讨了传统的中心模式 (TM) 和在线监考模式 (OLP) 下面对面进行的高风险英语口语测试成绩的可比性。数据包括大量通过 TM 或 OLP 参加四个 CEFR（“欧洲语言共同参考框架”）级别（B1 至 C2）的英语口语测试的考生样本。使用描述性统计、效应大小差异和等效性检验对数据进行了分析。虽然在 C2 级别，两种模式获得的分数存在一定差异，但这些差异并不具有统计学意义。本文的结论是，无论口语测试采用在线监考模式还是传统的面对面模式进行，考生获得的分数都相似。研究证实，考试方式不会显著影响考生的分数。
Abstract: This paper investigates the comparability of test scores recorded for high-stakes English language Speaking Tests administered face-to-face in either a traditional centre-based mode (TM) or in an online proctored mode (OLP). The data comprise a large sample of test takers taking English language Speaking Tests at four CEFR (the ‘Common European Framework of Reference for Languages’) levels — B1 to C2 — via TM or OLP. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics, effect size differences and equivalence tests. While a degree of difference in scores obtained between modes was apparent at C2 level, the differences were not found to be statistically significant. The paper concludes that whether Speaking Tests are delivered in online proctored mode or in traditional face-to-face mode, test takers receive similar scores. The study confirms that mode of test delivery does not significantly affect test taker scores.
文章引用：张杰. 传统监考模式与在线监考模式口语考试的对比研究[J]. 社科与人文前沿, 2024, 2(1): 1-6.
致谢：
基金项目：
参考文献

[1] Hodges C, Moore S, Lockee B, et al. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 2020.

[2] Lim C P, Wang L. Blended learning for quality higher education: Selected case studies on implementation from Asia-Pacific. Bangkok: UNESCO Bangkok Office, 2016.

[3] Todd R W. Teachers’perceptions ofthe shift from the classroom to online teaching. International Journal of Tesol Studies, 2020, 2(2): 4-16.

[4] Coniam D, Lampropoulou L, Cheilari A. Online proctoring of high-stakes examinations: A survey of past test takers' attitudes and perceptions. English Language Teaching, 2021, 14(8): 58-72.

[5] Gardner L. Covid-19 has forced higher ed to pivot to online learning. Here are  7 takeaways so far. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 2020, 20(5).

[6] Mays T J. Teaching the teachers. In Radical Solutions for Education in a Crisis Context. Springer, Singapore, 2021: 163-176.

[7] Sarrayrih M A, Ilyas M. Challenges of online exam, performances and problems for online university exam. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 2013, 10(1): 439.

[8] Berrada K, Ahmad H A S, Margoum S, et al. From the paper textbook to the online screen: A smart strategy to survive as an online learner. In Radical Solutions for Education in a Crisis Context. Singapore: Springer, 2021: 191-205.

为你推荐